{"id":4762,"date":"2015-05-27T10:07:56","date_gmt":"2015-05-27T14:07:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chriscolotti.us\/?p=4762"},"modified":"2015-05-27T10:07:56","modified_gmt":"2015-05-27T14:07:56","slug":"ubiquiti-unifi-product-line-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chriscolotti.us\/technology\/ubiquiti-unifi-product-line-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Ubiquiti Unifi Product Line Review"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n I sent out a couple tweets last week about doing a network upgrade in the house. \u00a0Yes it’s not even 6 months since I moved in and installed the network gear, but as time went on it became clear it was much more wonky than I expected. \u00a0Between the Apple Airport Extreme VLAN issues, and a tweaky UI on the Netgear switch I decided since Julie and I both work from home and the house is very internet connected, I needed something more stable. \u00a0I wanted to put together my experience and overall findings here for people to read about. \u00a0I was told about Ubiquiti Networks a while back by my friend Tim Jabaut<\/a>. \u00a0I decided to look into a 100% Unifi solution, but here is how it went.<\/p>\n As we built the house there was a few things we needed like PoE, up to 48 ports, a firewall\/gateway and multiple access points. \u00a0When we moved in the original configuration consisted of the following.<\/p>\n It all worked well with a few configuration exceptions. \u00a0I had three VLANs on the network to separate things like the security cameras from regular traffic as well as guests. \u00a0I was able to get it all working, but it required an Apple Airport to also be a gateway which resulted in a double NAT and extra hops just to get to the internet. \u00a0So client traffic was going to the Apple, then to the Cisco, to the Comcast modem out to the internet. \u00a0Finally it was three different UI’s for management and ultimately one core switch as a single point of failure.<\/p>\n After doing some research there is what’s known as the Unifi line of products marketed as an SMB version of their EdgeMax line. \u00a0At $399 per 24 port switch and $114 for their gateway it seemed like a possible solution. \u00a0The AC Access Points were a little pricey but I picked them up in a three pack. \u00a0I found a small vendor in Oklahoma that was AWESOME on pricing and delivery beyond everyone else so be sure to contact Jason at Unifying Solution<\/a>\u00a0to get some prices. \u00a0The other interesting thing that sealed it was the ability to run a cloud based controller for a single pane of glass for all aspects of the network. \u00a0This made it very “SDN-Like” since all the configurations are pushed from a controller to the devices. \u00a0It was very easy to stand up and configure and now I can monitor the network from anywhere outside the house. \u00a0It also means I can manage changes remotely without VPN or other access. \u00a0Below is a few screen shots including the Access Point coverage Map where you can import images of your site and insert the devices to see their expected coverage.<\/p>\nOriginal Network Setup Pre-Ubiquiti<\/h3>\n
\n
The Ubiquiti Unifi Solution<\/h3>\n